Why do you dislike the new system?
Remember Horse Armor those 10 years ago. Now look at DLC market this days.
Will same thing happen to modding? Well, apparently if you use free version of Midas Magic, every time you use new spell you get pop-up "buy me".
And then there's cut - while it might be nice for one-person-mods (which will be majority), big mods will not really get much popularity, unless they will be sold for crumpets (lets face it - we mod games because it's free). Big mods will need to split those 25% between many creators, which means less money per person, and since mod will be expensive, how many people will buy it?
Comment has been collapsed.
This guys post sums it up for me, it'll basically ruin the modding. And of course the whole 25% to the modder.
http://steamcommunity.com/app/72850/discussions/0/611704730319151037/
Comment has been collapsed.
14 Comments - Last post 5 minutes ago by Ignition365
46,878 Comments - Last post 27 minutes ago by MaxLevch
60 Comments - Last post 59 minutes ago by anditsung
1,096 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Gamy7
2,157 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by rashidnemar
122 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by philipdick
32 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by bluefoxxx
11 Comments - Last post 56 seconds ago by Golwar
10 Comments - Last post 6 minutes ago by RePlayBe
91 Comments - Last post 8 minutes ago by Asulf
56 Comments - Last post 10 minutes ago by aeari
59 Comments - Last post 13 minutes ago by JMM72
1 Comments - Last post 15 minutes ago by m0r1arty
56 Comments - Last post 19 minutes ago by TwigasHobbes
I'm not a big fan of the system either, but I don't think it's that bad. In my opinion, the amount the modder receives is a bit unfair. Well, Valve gets its 30%, fine. But when the developer is allowed to say they'll get 20% more than the modder... not fair. The minimum proportion the modder gets should be 35% and if the developer is kind, he might even earn more.
I don't think it's a big deal that the modder can set the minimum price to a number bigger than 0, but a pay-what-you-want system could also be nice (0$ would always be an option, too).
What do you think? Why do you dislike the new system? Or do you even dislike it?
Comment has been collapsed.