100 games per page. So at page 2 you have games from ranks 101 to 200.
Comment has been collapsed.
I don't care for or about this statistics, but I think that your idea is a decent one and I agree.
Comment has been collapsed.
3,378 Comments - Last post 7 seconds ago by Calibr3
0 Comments - Created 40 minutes ago by looseangel
22 Comments - Last post 59 minutes ago by PoobahGorg
13 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Sooth
642 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by drschnell
1,610 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by LinustheBold
458 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by devotee
30,914 Comments - Last post 2 minutes ago by jm
13 Comments - Last post 7 minutes ago by Masafor
10,411 Comments - Last post 20 minutes ago by Mortvie
44 Comments - Last post 30 minutes ago by Kyog
105 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Qnemes
58 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by FateOfOne
419 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by exactlee
As for now, if there are several games holding the same rank R, the next game will have rank R+1. For instance, three games hold rank 81, and the next game has rank 82. This system has an issue if many games have the same rank. You would think that a game with rank 245 is in top250 of most wanted games, however in fact it is only in top2000 at best. I suggest skipping ranks, which are occupied. So, for the example above three games have real ranks 81, 82, 83 but you display 81 for all three and it is fine because there is no good way to order them. But rank next games according to their real rank, which would be 84, not 82. I think this is a really small change, which adds value to the community wishlist.
Comment has been collapsed.