100 games per page. So at page 2 you have games from ranks 101 to 200.
Comment has been collapsed.
I don't care for or about this statistics, but I think that your idea is a decent one and I agree.
Comment has been collapsed.
15,356 Comments - Last post 35 minutes ago by Kenruyoh
20 Comments - Last post 35 minutes ago by quijote3000
1,290 Comments - Last post 36 minutes ago by quijote3000
307 Comments - Last post 41 minutes ago by mrh1109
76 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by BorschtLover
730 Comments - Last post 13 hours ago by adam1224
361 Comments - Last post 13 hours ago by Golwar
11 Comments - Last post 5 minutes ago by Sno1
42 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by GediKnight
22 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Sykon
2,375 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by JMM72
157 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by JMM72
26,438 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by M1k3k
111 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by ImpartialJuices
As for now, if there are several games holding the same rank R, the next game will have rank R+1. For instance, three games hold rank 81, and the next game has rank 82. This system has an issue if many games have the same rank. You would think that a game with rank 245 is in top250 of most wanted games, however in fact it is only in top2000 at best. I suggest skipping ranks, which are occupied. So, for the example above three games have real ranks 81, 82, 83 but you display 81 for all three and it is fine because there is no good way to order them. But rank next games according to their real rank, which would be 84, not 82. I think this is a really small change, which adds value to the community wishlist.
Comment has been collapsed.