It isn't unfair if I haven't see a single bundle in all of those years that I wanted to buy. Hell, probably even a single game I wanted to play.

this guy would love to do it, but i guess the strong backlash of some users are demotivating ;-) https://www.steamgifts.com/discussion/BbZcT/dig-bundles#ilF1kyE

I can't talk for her, you would need to ask her if it's important for you. But since she is doing all of that voluntarily, I wouldnt question that.
However, I guess it's because on barter sources of tradeables are an important information and DIG is still a common source. So it's less "advertising/recommending", but needed additional information. Also barter is managed by several persons, thus the decision might not be up to her.

There's three extremely obvious potential answers available just by taking a quick glance at the listings present on the linked barter page:

1. DIG releases content at a spam-level rate, and protocol on SG means that that'd all be presented in a single thread (to avoid flooding out higher interest threads), where they'd be presented in more or less exactly the same format as the barter page, making an SG thread needlessly redundant.
2. DIG is pure shovelware, without exception or redemption, and has been for a long time. (By contrast, in the distant past, DIG did at least have occasional decent indie games and decent HOGs.) In fact, for a time DIG was a meme reference on SG for guaranteed bottom-of-the-barrel trashware. eg, "This is the kind of game you'd only find on DIG". Nowadays, the community mostly just doesn't even think about DIG, IG, or Groupees at all, due to the rock-bottom reputations of all three sites and the fact that they haven't had any meaningful presence on SG for several years as a result of such.
3. DIG now mostly offers adult content, which is prohibited by SG's ToS to link to. (ToS, 2. [..] the Content is not pornographic, does not contain threats or incite violence, and does not violate the privacy or publicity rights of any third party). Such links have been heavily moderated in the past (this despite the massive contradiction caused by SG fully allowing soft porn image embeds and porn game listings, both of which moderators have allowed without comment and cg hasn't been willing to accept discussion over). Whatever current day standards for such content are, it'd still be a needless stress to deal with.

Add in the seemingly substantial lack of interest in DIG (plus current day Groupees bundles or ScamGala bundles) here on SG (as re-validated to some degree by the poll in this thread), and the fact that DIG contains a grey marketplace on its website (which are prohibited to link to on SG, and which effectively disables linking to any part of the website) and it'd be a lot of needless effort for her to deal with the hassle of formatting and presenting such threads here on SG (compared to the presumably much lower effort of just inputing bits of data into Barter, which'd handle the formatting on its own).

Are any of those the reason she doesn't do it? Who knows.
But with those already existing, is there even any reason to really need additional clarification?

Then I'd miss all the comments about IGN betraying their customers by denying them everything for $1. ;)

If you mean ethically, nothing. Afaik.
I just barely see a point in checking out their new deals and bundles. Over 90% of them are overpriced or a collection of rebundles. In the worst case a combination of both. I literally wouldn't be their customer anymore if Group Buy wouldn't exist, to pick some selected few games.

i'm giving away keys and, sometimes, games. i'm talking about CV and whitelists, not about protecting buyers and victims. nor about Lilly decision.

And people are talking about the reasons why Lilly doesn't want to do anything with the site, which is similarly a choice as yours was to not care the years worth of unethical behaviour the site's admins shown to both devs and purchasers. You do you, but please do understand that you support something that many people frown upon (and ask around if anybody else supports it as well, and make your life easier by making a nice table of what they sell)

Of course anybody can pick up the job and make posts about the bundles, as you said (and as far as I know) it's not against the rules as per cg's decision. I'm personally very happy about Lilly's decision because those posts only cluttered the deals section - unwanted games from an unlikable source.

In a nutshell: do as you wish, write what you wish - it's just weird that you seem to besurprised by the reactions, while apparently knowing about DIG's infamy.

Coprophagia is (the habit of) eating feces, in this context I guess it's "eating up the shit that DIG serves" would be the closest analogue

No, I meant threads for DIG stuff.

I knoooow, it's been so long.. :o/ I was never a big poster to begin with, but I have to admit I've been even more in lurking mode these past months. Even on Steam. I'm not feeling super talkative nowadays. sowwy

and want to create giveaways. would it be useful for you having also DIG bundle threads

Yes, of course. However, I don't think we can totally brush aside Exosyphen's unethical way of doing business. Having DIG threads on the forum would still promote his store and drive some sales and it'd be exposure I don't think he deserves. The same goes with Groupees, now that they've started reselling Steam keys. But then again, unless CG treats those like gray markets sites, creating DIG and Groupees isn't prohibited so if someone wants to do that, I couldn't care less. In DIG's case though, it'd probably be a real pain in the arse: if I remember correctly, there are several new DIG bundles per week and Exo would swap games within a bundle, keeping up with all the changes might prove to be quite an ordeal.

With that being said, I don't like Fanatical's mystery bundles... but if anything, Lilly's charts detailing the possible drops act as a powerful deterrent in my case, I'm so not tempted to gamble when I see there's nothing I'd be interested in. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

All that talk about ice cone... now I want ice cream. :D
missed you too! <3

View attached image.

pre pay $5 to your account last i knew