"Researchers from several universities have teamed up to develop a radical kind of transistor. Instead of using silicon, the team used graphene to build a logic gate series that uses less power but could work 1,000 times faster than current ones.

The discovery of graphene in 2004 began a flurry of studies to isolate other two-dimensional materials. Graphene was found to be a wonder material, possessing a set of unique and remarkable properties. One of these is its ability to conduct electricity ten times better than copper, the most commonly used conductor in electronics. At room temperature, graphene is also capable of conducting electricity 250 times better than silicon, a rate faster than any other known substance.
These properties led a team of researchers from Northwestern University, The University of Texas at Dallas (UT Dallas), University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, and University of Central Florida (UCF) to consider developing a graphene-based transistor. In a study published in the journal Nature Communications, the team found that a graphene-based transistor could actually work better than silicon transistors used in today’s computers.

Transistors are key in today’s computer circuits, as these act as on and off switches that allow electronic signals and electrical power through. When put together, transistors form logic gates — the core of microprocessors, serving as input and output and acting either as 0s or 1s (so-called binary bits). These are what allow microprocessors to solve logic and computing problems.
“If you want to continue to push technology forward, we need faster computers to be able to run bigger and better simulations for climate science, for space exploration, for Wall Street,” co-author Ryan Gelfand, an assistant professor at UCF, said in a press release. “To get there, we can’t rely on silicon transistors anymore.

Microprocessors built using silicon transistors have been stuck at processing speeds mostly in the 3 to 4 gigahertz range since 2005. There’s a limit to the rate of signals and power these transistors can handle, largely due to the material’s resistance. The team of researchers, however, found a way through this limitation by using graphene instead of silicon.

The team’s graphene transistor-based logic circuits improved the clock speed of microprocessors by a thousand times, and would require a hundredth of the power required by silicon-based computers. Plus, these circuits were also smaller than logic circuits that use silicon transistors. This could allow for smaller electronic devices that squeeze in more functionality, Gelfand explained. A similar study also explored graphene as a potential capacitor for quantum computers.

The exceptional material properties of carbon materials permit Terahertz operation and two orders of magnitude decrease in power-delay product compared to cutting-edge microprocessors,” the researchers wrote. “We hope to inspire the fabrication of these cascaded logic circuits to stimulate a transformative generation of energy-efficient computing."

https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2017/08/your-computer-could-be-1000-times-faster-in-the-the-future-thanks-to-graphene

5 years ago

Comment has been collapsed.

Sounds great, but what would happen with the production costs?

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 5 years ago.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I know about it since around 2012. Production costs are still too high, but since then I've heard about several student patents regarding graphene production which should significantly lower the costs of it so supposedly around 2025-2030 it could be a thing available to the masses

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Unfortunately, logic gates getting 1,000 times faster will not make your computer run 1,000 times faster. I mean, any speedup is good news for number crunchers, but processors haven't been a bottleneck in most applications for a very long time now. Your average processor is bored out of its skull waiting for things to happen around it. The researchers are correct in pointing out that the major benefit would be more energy efficient computing, not necessarily faster computing at the same cost.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

this technology could also be applied to gpu's and ram. everything would get a boost if they could make this practically and cheap to mass produce. But that could take some time.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

It's a big if, yes. Promising new technologies have been on the horizon before without managing to become economical enough to actually sell in volume. RAM would be the major thing to benefit, more so than CPUs.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I think Carbon Nano Tube is more interesting. It can be conductor and semiconductor, having quite high strength and light weight. A CNT is a folded graphene in the shape of tube so the basic characteristics are the same. It's not yet established how to separately produce conductor CNT and semiconductor CNT in a mass when I studied around it though.
The original paper (and the figure on the article) uses CNTs to make electrical currents around the graphene. They look closer to the real circuit material in my opinion.
Fullerene had been the most incompetent material in the carbon nano structure family until recently. But they found it has an efficient property as a catalyst in some cutting edge areas and it's easy to produce.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Don't get excited for this, I made that mistake almost 15 years ago (when it was discovered).

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Does it uninstall Windows 10 and replace it with Windows 7 too?

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

you can expect great things from graphene.
when? depends on what you want.
it seems to be very promising for batteries as well.
and you can buy graphene infused high performance bike frames already. with a price tag that's not for the faint hearted.

time will tell.

5 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Sign in through Steam to add a comment.