Can steam stop assuming genders?

This is interesting ... .
Would I mock someone if by appearance I will call him male or female and he is non-binary and if so why is that ?
Also interesting the terms binary and non-binary.
I don't know if this is similar with CS or not , but binary is 1 and 0 and non-binary is quantum meaning that it is not 0 or 1 or can be both in the same time. This is why the quantum computer is so complicated !

Spoken like a true male who doesn't care about imposing his will upon women... story for the ages.

While it's mildly refreshing to see someone assume that someone with the username "MissMokushiroku" is male, I'm afraid that I am, in fact, a cis woman. Sorry to disappoint you.

This is the kind of shit and awful attitude the transgender movement spews. Good to know you support that.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suffragette#Arson.2C_Property_damage_and_domestic_terrorism

Throughout the woman's suffrage movement, many tactics were employed in order to achieve the goals of the movement. Throughout Britain, letters and the letterboxes that contained them were burnt or had acid poured onto them. Places that wealthy people, typically men, would occupy themselves with were also burnt and destroyed, including cricket pitches and horse racing tracks.

The Tea House at Kew Gardens was set alight by Suffragettes Olive Wharry and Lillian Lenton in February 1913 during a series of arson attacks that occurred throughout London. Suffragettes are also believed to have attacked the Orchard house, also at Kew Gardens[26] however no definitive proof was found.

This is the kind of shit and awful attitude the votes-for-women movement spews. Good to know you support that.

In all seriousness, I read the post you linked to. It's rude, angry, and abrasive...but that's about it. I was expecting something like a call to arms for trans people to go out and shoot up women's shelters. Instead I get a couple people venting about someone whom they would later talk things over and make amends with. As someone who once had a guy threaten to rape and murder me because I KO'd his character in a round of 100% Orange Juice, I'm unimpressed.

But, honestly, that's not even the real issue. The issue is that you apparently believe that "the transgender movement" is a hive mind whose sole purpose in life is to call for the subjugation of cis people...because of one rude blog post. Not even a blog post calling for violence, just a rude blog post. Clearly transgender people aren't a hive mind, since I've met and befriended several trans people both online and IRL, including people actively part of "the transgender movement", and not a single one of them has even attempted to put me down for being cis. Ever.

Actually...does it count as subjugation if it's a trans person's D&D character blindly attacking who they think is a monster, but it's actually the party's cleric, who happens to be played by a cis woman (me)? Because that happened once.

All that said, if you want to respond, I'd appreciate it if you would read over the comments I've made in this thread, count how many times I used the word "cis" before you first replied to me, and report back with that number. I'm curious about why you responded to my comment about the history of singular they and other third-person singular pronouns in the English language with a warning about using the word "cis."

Indeed!

View attached image.

Succinct: brief, pithy, clear (I guess you could take issue with the latter).
Ironic: using a word to the opposite of its meaning and/or for mockery
Sarcastic: using irony/cutting commentary generally to show contempt,
Sardonic: generally synonymous with sarcasm but sometimes taken to be more negative
Long-winded:lengthy, tedious (subjective, but a fair assessment of someone defining common words when no one appeared to be confused).

I don't know if these are the five terms given that your comment was only long enough to convey a vague sense of masbutatory self-regard, but I figured I'd take a guess. Please explain. Unless you're under the misapprehension that the above are somehow mutually exclusive terms?

As for intent, I didn't think my sarcasm was terribly subtle in the original message, but I'll grant that tone can be hard to decipher online especially when you don't know the person. With that said, one might read that as a reason to not treat messages as, as you've humorously phrased it, indirect requests for vocabulary clarifications.

I'd bow out and say I won't bother reading your reply as you don't appear interested in speaking to me like I'm a person, but I'm new to this site and don't know how to turn off notifications. So reply with the assured satisfaction of having the last word and having that word read.

Here's a picture of my cacti I took today in my office, a picture to remember this thrilling interaction with, to make things a little less impersonal. I think my favourite (Canadian spelling) is the little dude in the corner. Have a good night.

View attached image.

Suuuure you are buddy ;)

That proves that intersex people make up a comparatively small portion of the total population. How does it prove that there are only two sexes, when it specifically says later in the article that biological sex is a spectrum where some people are closer to "male", some are closer to "female", and others can't be classified either way?

Why do intersex people have to be common in order to be considered their own biological sex separate from male and female, given that intersex people have different biological characteristics and health needs from both non-intersex males and non-intersex females?